home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: informatik.tu-muenchen.de!fischerj
- From: fischerj@informatik.tu-muenchen.de (Juergen "Rally" Fischer)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Subject: Re: C2P
- Date: 23 Jan 1996 17:27:40 GMT
- Organization: Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Germany
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <4e35qc$8n4@sunsystem5.informatik.tu-muenchen.de>
- References: <4cu7vo$17q@sinsen.sn.no> <4djdu8$ba@oreig.uji.es> <4dkbml$em2@maureen.teleport.com> <4dm3sm$pvm@sunsystem5.informatik.tu-muenchen.de> <4e0rrm$hld@oreig.uji.es>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: hphalle5.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
- Originator: fischerj@hphalle5.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-
-
- In article <4e0rrm$hld@oreig.uji.es>, ii202@rossegat.uji.es (Jorge Acereda Macia) writes:
- |> Organization: Universitat Jaume I. Castell≤ de la Plana. Spain
- |> Lines: 24
- |> Distribution: world
- |> Message-ID: <4e0rrm$hld@oreig.uji.es>
- |> References: <4cu7vo$17q@sinsen.sn.no> <4djdu8$ba@oreig.uji.es> <4dkbml$em2@maureen.teleport.com> <4dm3sm$pvm@sunsystem5.informatik.tu-muenchen.de>
- |> NNTP-Posting-Host: @rossegat.uji.es
- |> X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
- |>
- |> Juergen "Rally" Fischer (fischerj@informatik.tu-muenchen.de) wrote:
- |>
- |> > |> : IMHO it's better to measure ms. instead of scanlines... Scanlines
- |> > |> : measuring is harder in OS-friendly code.
- |>
- |> > no timer is more accurate than showing the timing via raster display.
- |> > you know any method with less overhead than the 8 cycles for a write
- |> > to colorregister ?
- |>
- |> Yeah, but when testing multitasking code this can be a bit harder.
- |> ReadEClock() is fast. A scanline is a lot of time. ms are more accurate
-
- mhm in which lib is this ? OS3.0 ? Do I need to open something bevore
- using it ?
-
- |> in this sense if you measure in "integer rasterlines".
- |>
- |> And what's that of writing to colorregisters? Are you counting scanlines
- |> directly in the monitor??? %-)
-
- if they're only 2 or 3, yes! you even can see if it's only 2.5 scanlines,
- VERY accurate!
-
- when counting 100 scanlines or so, I measure the length of the bar on
- TV and divide through the hight of a wb screen :D works well & accurate,
- however the biggest advantage is the 1st example I mentioned.
-
- |>
- |> Greets,
- |> --
- |> ---------------------------- --------------------------------------------
- |> | Jorge Acereda | Dream the same thing everynight |
- |> | ii202@rossegat.uji.es | I see our freedom in my sight |
- |> | Intel Outside | No locked doors, no windows barred |
- |> | Amiga Rules | No things to make my brain seem scarred |
- |> ---------------------------- --------------------------------------------
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
- fischerj@Informatik.TU-Muenchen.DE (Juergen "Rally" Fischer) =:)
-
-